Home > Businesses > Archived Reviews of Tucker Gardner > Review

"Tuckers = Professionalism"

A review of Tucker Gardner by Peter Dunthorne written on Thursday 30th of November 2006

Advertisements

I completely disagree with the remark about tuckers being "The Worst Agent Ever!".

I dealt with haart originally and i was told things would happen but didnt. I then chose to switch to tuckers and found the service provided by everyone in the shelford office to be very professional and courteous. Tuckers had a more realistic view on my property and offered me a much more informed view on the way i should market it which eventually lead to a sale within days. I would happily stand up for tuckers as being the best agent in cambridge and would challenge anyone to say different..

Agree? Disagree? Add your own review of Tucker Gardner

Did you find this review inappropriate or offensive?

More Tucker Gardner Reviews

Now showing reviews 1-5 of 9

View all 9 reviews »

  • One sided estate agency by Anonymous
    We recently entered into a bidding war with another prospective buyer with a house under the instruc...
  • Excellent service, very prompt by Quarkbeast
    I've recently rented a property, and found Tucker Gardner to be excellent. Very fast turnaround, pro...
  • Uninformed out of the loop by Anon
    To Be honest I havent so far been impressed with the way in which they have handeled our application...
  • Biggest for a reason by Ruler34
    Tucker Gardner are a bit like Tescos, you can dislike them because they are so big - or you can admi...
  • Really disappointed!!!! by Betta
    We applied for a property paying 200 pounds. We called them to see the status of our application. Th...

View all Tucker Gardner reviews

Advertisements

NOTE: Reviews are submitted by visitors of our site. The contents of this page are in no way representative of the entity being reviewed, Tucker Gardner, and are merely third party opinions. Cambridge Online accepts no liability in respect of any material submitted by visitors and published by us and we are not responsible for its content and accuracy. For further details, see our Terms & Conditions.